linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 LMM protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z-v579n5wuAqTuUW@pluto>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:36:31 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 LMM protocol

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:21:51PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:53:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > 
> > Add Logical Machine Management(LMM) protocol which is intended for boot,
> > shutdown, and reset of other logical machines (LM). It is usually used to
> > allow one LM to manager another used as an offload or accelerator engine.
> >
> 
> This and next patch LGTM. Just curious as why Cristian has given tags only
> for the drivers using these but not these changes.
> 
> Cristian, any specific concerns you had that had to be addressed or addressed
> in this version ?

I think I had some review comments on the previous version of this
series for Documentation and protocol....let me see wth I said about
this :D and if they have been addressed...

Thanks,
Cristian