linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 LMM protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250401-accurate-quixotic-coua-86aed0@sudeepholla>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:48:23 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] firmware: arm_scmi: imx: Add i.MX95 LMM protocol

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:36:31PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:21:51PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:53:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > 
> > > Add Logical Machine Management(LMM) protocol which is intended for boot,
> > > shutdown, and reset of other logical machines (LM). It is usually used to
> > > allow one LM to manager another used as an offload or accelerator engine.
> > >
> > 
> > This and next patch LGTM. Just curious as why Cristian has given tags only
> > for the drivers using these but not these changes.
> > 
> > Cristian, any specific concerns you had that had to be addressed or addressed
> > in this version ?
> 
> I think I had some review comments on the previous version of this
> series for Documentation and protocol....let me see wth I said about
> this :D and if they have been addressed...
> 

Thanks that would be great. I can't recall which version I had a look,
hence thought of asking.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep