[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250402184820.GJZ-2GdG-CWRxEwTmy@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 20:48:20 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, amit.shah@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, sandipan.das@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, Babu.Moger@....com,
david.kaplan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/bugs: Rename entry_ibpb()
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> It helps it stand out more? :-)
Please don't.
Someone thought that it is a good idea to start using that // ugliness all of
a sudden.
So we decided we should limit it in tip:
Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst
The paragrapn that starts with "Use C++ style, tail comments when documenting
..."
> I was thinking the calling interface is a bit nonstandard. But actually
> it's fine to call from C as those registers are already caller-saved
> anyway. So yeah, let's drop the '__'.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists