[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgfX7yfDYVOF8VqRR60RaBFbK=FZMLqOx0nT4ckMnS0ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:07:27 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] more printk for 6.15
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 11:39, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The problem with (automatic) Link tag is that it points to the latest version
> of the patch where all of the discussion have been settled down. And more (but
> maybe not full) information is available on the previous versions. The fix
> would be to have some kind of version tracking system for the series (oh,
> sounds like Gerrit :).
No, the fix is to admit that noise is noise, and that search engines
are better at context than some silly commit-time noise.
The whole "link to original submission" is garbage.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists