linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] more printk for 6.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgWT4AOFgMxSBVqYD9dVPXTr775UAwyX9cUOz=0ahf3_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:10:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] more printk for 6.15

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 12:07, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The whole "link to original submission" is garbage.

Just to clarify: people should link to the *problem* report. Or to the
*debugging* thread.

But linking to the final result is pointless. That's what in the tree,
and any subsequent discussion about it is stale and late.

People sometimes argue that it's good for belated Ack's etc. But
Christ - they are *belated*.

        Linus