linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for cpu event term

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fW1cJRnU73udpXC9ayN8j-cAyjJK_ZOp97Z=LsagQcevg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:57:01 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, 
	Yoshihiro Furudera <fj5100bi@...itsu.com>, Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>, 
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, 
	Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support for cpu event term

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 9:22 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:38 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Being able to set the cpu mask per event was discussed in the context
> > of a sysfs event.cpus file is discussed here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fXXuWchzUK0n5KTH8kamr=DQoEni+bUoo8f-4j8Y+eMBg@mail.gmail.com/
> > Ultimately Kan preferred to have multiple PMUs with a cpumask each
> > rather than an event.cpus file per event. It is still useful to have
> > the cpu event term and so the sysfs part of the original patch series
> > is dropped.
> >
> > v5: Purely a rebase.
> > v4: Add the stat-display output change for zero counters Namhyung
> >     requested as part of the series:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zvx9VbJWtmkcuSBs@google.com/
> >     This skips zero values for CPUs not in the evsel's cpumask rather
> >     than the evsel's PMU's cpumask.
> > v3: Drop sysfs event.cpus file support patch from series.  Reference
> >     to using cpu to modify uncore events is dropped from the commit
> >     message. Reference counting issues on the cpumap are addressed.
> > v2: Add support for multiple cpu terms on an event that are
> >     merged. For example, an event of "l1d-misses/cpu=4,cpu=5/" will
> >     now be opened on both CPU 4 and 5 rather than just CPU 4.
> >
> > Ian Rogers (4):
> >   libperf cpumap: Add ability to create CPU from a single CPU number
> >   perf stat: Use counter cpumask to skip zero values
> >   perf parse-events: Set is_pmu_core for legacy hardware events
> >   perf parse-events: Add "cpu" term to set the CPU an event is recorded
>
> Ping.

Ping.

Thanks,
Ian

> Thanks,
> Ian