[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6acb2692-8946-4ab2-b433-4f68c080f6b9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:19:19 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Support ROHM BD79104 ADC
On 02/04/2025 09:07, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Finally, I didn't find maintainer information for this driver from the
> MAINTAINERS file. I would like to add myself as a reviewer for the
> driver, so I can stay on track of the changes to it. AFAIR, having
> R-entry without M-entry was not appreciated. Any suggestions how to
> handle this?
Jonathan, I suppose this, by default, falls under the umbrella of your
IIO maintainership. Are you Okay with it if I'll add a maintainer entry
which sets you explicitly as a maintainer for this, and list myself as a
reviewer?
I suppose I could also add myself as a maintainer for this, but I am
unsure how well it would be received by the TI people ;)
> This series was based on the v6.14, but it should apply cleanly on
> iio/testing - please let me know if I should rebase.
Just realized I forgot to update this. The series is now based on
543da6252b48 in the iio/testing. Nonetheless, I can still rebase if needed.
Yours,
-- Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists