[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250403-kaufanreiz-leber-c7c878cc833e@brauner>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:55:48 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, pr-tracker-bot@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vfs mount
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:18:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 11:25, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &namespace_sem)
> > > > + guard(rwsem_read, &namespace_sem);
> > >
> > > I'm looking at Linus's master commit a2cc6ff5ec8f ("Merge tag
> > > 'firewire-updates-6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394")
> > > and guard is declared as macro which gets only one argument: include/linux/cleanup.h
> > > 318 #define guard(_name) \
> > > 319 CLASS(_name, __UNIQUE_ID(guard))
> >
> > Christian didn't test his patch, obviously.
>
> Yes, I just sent this out as "I get why this happens." after my
> screaming "dammit" moment. Sorry that I didn't make this clear. I had a
> pretty strong "ffs" 10 minutes after I had waded through the overlayfs
> code I added without being able to figure out how the fsck this could've
> happened. In any case, there's the obviously correct version now sitting
> in the tree and it's seen testing obviously.
I'll also append it here just in case you want to apply it right now.
View attachment "v2-0001-fs-actually-hold-the-namespace-semaphore.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (917 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists