[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z+6McMRYjHM8aUXI@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:26:08 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
<john.allen@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <xin3.li@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky
<mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Mitchell
Levy" <levymitchell0@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>, Vignesh Balasubramanian
<vigbalas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Add CET supervisor xfeature
support
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:37:32PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>On 4/1/25 10:15, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> In V3, you moved this patch further back to position 8 out of 10. Now,
>> in this version, you've placed it at position 3 out of 8.
>>
>> This raises the question of whether you've fully internalized his advice.
>
>Uh huh.
>
>1. Refactor/fix existing code
>2. Add new infrastructure
>3. Add new feature
Okay. Then, Chang's interpretation is accurate. I will organize the series
in this order.
Thank you both.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists