[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <910d7fc8-e4d1-4421-a118-b8a254a3fe37@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:52:24 -0400
From: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] pwm: Let pwm_set_waveform() succeed even if lowlevel
driver rounded up
On 2025-04-05 05:27, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Waveform parameters are supposed to be rounded down to the next value
> possible for the hardware. However when a requested value is too small,
> .round_waveform_tohw() is supposed to pick the next bigger value and
> return 1. Let pwm_set_waveform() behave in the same way.
>
> This creates consistency between pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep() with
> exact=false and pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep() +
> pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep() with exact=true.
>
> The PWM_DEBUG rounding check has to be adapted to only trigger if no
> uprounding happend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Tested-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists