Message-ID: <bfbe0c7f-c203-4056-97fe-0e27d2875206@kwiboo.se>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:33:51 +0200
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
 Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>,
 Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
 Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/12] media: rkvdec: Add get_image_fmt ops

On 2025-04-07 17:07, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> On 2025-04-07 16:59, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>> Le lundi 07 avril 2025 à 16:17 +0200, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
>>> On 07/04/2025 15:52, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>>> Le lundi 07 avril 2025 à 13:09 +0200, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
>>>>> On 25/02/2025 10:40, Sebastian Fricke wrote:
>>>>>> From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add support for a get_image_fmt() ops that returns the required image
>>>>>> format.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The CAPTURE format is reset when the required image format changes and
>>>>>> the buffer queue is not busy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>  drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h |  2 ++
>>>>>>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
>>>>>> index 70154948b4e32e2c439f259b0f1e1bbc8b52b063..5394079509305c619f1d0c1f542bfc409317c3b7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c
>>>>>> @@ -111,15 +111,60 @@ static int rkvdec_try_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>  	struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx = container_of(ctrl->handler, struct rkvdec_ctx, ctrl_hdl);
>>>>>>  	const struct rkvdec_coded_fmt_desc *desc = ctx->coded_fmt_desc;
>>>>>> +	struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *pix_mp = &ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp;
>>>>>> +	enum rkvdec_image_fmt image_fmt;
>>>>>> +	struct vb2_queue *vq;
>>>>>> +	int ret;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (desc->ops->try_ctrl) {
>>>>>> +		ret = desc->ops->try_ctrl(ctx, ctrl);
>>>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>>>> +			return ret;
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (!desc->ops->get_image_fmt)
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -	if (desc->ops->try_ctrl)
>>>>>> -		return desc->ops->try_ctrl(ctx, ctrl);
>>>>>> +	image_fmt = desc->ops->get_image_fmt(ctx, ctrl);
>>>>>> +	if (ctx->image_fmt == image_fmt)
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (rkvdec_is_valid_fmt(ctx, pix_mp->pixelformat, image_fmt))
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	/* format change not allowed when queue is busy */
>>>>>> +	vq = v4l2_m2m_get_vq(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx,
>>>>>> +			     V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE);
>>>>>> +	if (vb2_is_busy(vq))
>>>>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> Looking closer, this code is just wrong. It does these format change
>>> tests for any control, so if more controls are added in the future, then
>>> those will be checked the same way, which makes no sense.
>>
>> "Just wrong" should be kept for code that is semantically incorrect,
>> just a suggestion for choice of wording.
>>
>>>
>>> These tests belong to the actual control that you 'try'. In this case
>>> rkvdec_h264_validate_sps(). This function already checks the width and
>>> height, but it should also check the image format. It is all in the
>>> wrong place.
> 
> Keep in mind that rkvdec_try_ctrl and rkvdec_s_ctrl are only used for
> CID_STATELESS_H264_SPS (and in future also CID_STATELESS_HEVC_SPS) not
> any other control, so this is already in the correct place?
> 
> Maybe the naming of the functions are too generic, they could be named
> rkvdec_sps_try_ctrl and rkvdec_sps_s_ctrl or similar if that makes more
> sense?
> 
> Regards,
> Jonas
> 
>>
>> We can do that too. Though, this was generalized since once you enable
>> the other codecs, you endup with code duplication. I know this series
>> is an extract from a larger one.
>>
>> So let's suggest to make a helper that combines rkvdec_is_valid_fmt()
>> and the busy check. Though on that, please reply to my comment below
>> (which you skipped).
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This makes no sense to me. This just tries a control, and that should just
>>>>> work, regardless of vb2_is_busy(). It's a 'try', so you are not actually
>>>>> changing anything.
>>>>
>>>> See comment below, notice that this code is only reached if the control
>>>> introduce parameters that are not compatible with the current capture
>>>> queue fmt. The entire function uses "success" early exit, so the
>>>> further down you get in the function, the less likely your control is
>>>> valid.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	return 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static int rkvdec_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>>>>>> +{
>>>
>>> If there is a try_ctrl op specified, then the control framework
>>> will call that first before calling s_ctrl. So any validation that
>>> try_ctrl did does not need to be done again in s_ctrl.
>>>
>>> The same comment with try_ctrl is valid here as well: if there are
>>> image format checks that need to be done, then those need to be done
>>> per control and not as a generic check. If new controls are added in
>>> the future, then you don't want the same checks to apply to the new
>>> controls as well.
>>
>> I don't think the behaviour of try_ctrl and that being embedded in set
>> calls was being questioned by anyone. Can you reply to the last
>> paragraph below ?
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> 	Hans
>>>
>>>>>> +	struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx = container_of(ctrl->handler, struct rkvdec_ctx, ctrl_hdl);
>>>>>> +	const struct rkvdec_coded_fmt_desc *desc = ctx->coded_fmt_desc;
>>>>>> +	struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *pix_mp = &ctx->decoded_fmt.fmt.pix_mp;
>>>>>> +	enum rkvdec_image_fmt image_fmt;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (!desc->ops->get_image_fmt)
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	image_fmt = desc->ops->get_image_fmt(ctx, ctrl);
>>>>>> +	if (ctx->image_fmt == image_fmt)
>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really can't set a control when the queue is busy, then that should
>>>>> be tested here, not in try_ctrl. And then you return -EBUSY.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I missing something here?
>>>>
>>>> When I reviewed, I had imagine that s_ctrl on a request would just run
>>>> a try. Now that I read that more careful, I see that it does a true set
>>>> on separate copy. So yes, this can safely be moved here.
>>>>
>>>> Since you seem wondering "If you really can't set a control", let me
>>>> explain what Jonas wants to protect against. RKVdec does not have any
>>>> color conversion code, the header compound control (which header
>>>> depends on the codec), contains details such as sub-sampling and color
>>>> depth. Without color conversion, when the image format is locked (the
>>>> busy queue), you can't request the HW to decode a frame witch does not
>>>> fit. This could otherwise lead to buffer overflow in the HW,
>>>> fortunately protected by the iommu, but you don't really want to depend
>>>> on the mmu.
>>>>
>>>> I've never used try_ctrl in my decade of v4l2, so obviously, now that I
>>>> know that s_ctrl on request is not a try, I'm fine with rejecting this
>>>> PR, sending a new version and making a PR again. But if I was to use
>>>> this API in userspace, my intuitive expectation would be that this
>>>> should fail try(), even if its very rarely valid to check the queue
>>>> state in try control.
>>
>> Here, since we seem to disagree on the behaviour try should have for
>> this specific validation. What you asked on first pass is to make it so
>> that TRY will succeed, and SET will fail. I don't really like that
>> suggestion.

The s_ctrl here does not validate if the image_fmt is valid or not,
compared to try_ctrl, s_ctrl instead tries to do the opposite, if the
ctrl value cause image_fmt to change the decoded fmt is reset.

Something that is only valid when the queue is not busy, and because try
is called before set, I did not see any reason to do that check here as
set would never be called by core.

Please elaborate how this code is just wrong, it is only called for sps
ctrl, as intended, try will report an error as suggested in docs and set
will reset the decoded fmt to match the new sps ctrl value.

Regards,
Jonas

>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> 	Hans
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	ctx->image_fmt = image_fmt;
>>>>>> +	if (!rkvdec_is_valid_fmt(ctx, pix_mp->pixelformat, ctx->image_fmt))
>>>>>> +		rkvdec_reset_decoded_fmt(ctx);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops rkvdec_ctrl_ops = {
>>>>>>  	.try_ctrl = rkvdec_try_ctrl,
>>>>>> +	.s_ctrl = rkvdec_s_ctrl,
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static const struct rkvdec_ctrl_desc rkvdec_h264_ctrl_descs[] = {
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h
>>>>>> index 6f8cf50c5d99aad2f52e321f54f3ca17166ddf98..e466a2753ccfc13738e0a672bc578e521af2c3f2 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h
>>>>>> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ struct rkvdec_coded_fmt_ops {
>>>>>>  		     struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *dst_buf,
>>>>>>  		     enum vb2_buffer_state result);
>>>>>>  	int (*try_ctrl)(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx, struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl);
>>>>>> +	enum rkvdec_image_fmt (*get_image_fmt)(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>> +					       struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl);
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  enum rkvdec_image_fmt {
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists