linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/28] Add Microchip ZL3073x support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z_QUKyEmtNcxlbTt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 21:06:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] Add Microchip ZL3073x support

On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 07:28:27PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> This series adds support for Microchip Azurite DPLL/PTP/SyncE chip
> family. These chips provide DPLL and PTP functionality, so the series
> adds the common MFD driver that provides an access to the bus that can
> be either I2C or SPI. The second part of the series is DPLL driver that
> covers DPLL functionality. The PTP support will be added by separate
> series as well as flashing capability.
> 
> All functionality was tested by myself and by Prathosh Satish on
> Microchip EDS2 development board with ZL30732 DPLL chip connected over
> I2C bus.
> 
> Patch breakdown
> ===============
> Patch 1 - Basic support for I2C, SPI and regmap

Was enough to me to see that this need more work. Just take your time and do
internal review. It seems like one is missed. I believe you have a lot of
experienced kernel maintainers and contributors who can help you with that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko