[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b77155e4-9f60-42f5-94db-1d2e4c0aed55@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:12:02 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Support ROHM BD797xx DACs
On 05/04/2025 20:18, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:44:20 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Support ROHM BD797xx DACs
>>
>> ROHM BD79700, BD79701 and BD79702 are very similar to the already
>> sipported BD79703. Main difference is the reduced number of channels.
> supported.
>> Also, the *00 and *01 variants lack of the separate Vfs pin.
>>
>> This series adds support for the BD79700, BD79701 and BD79702.
>
> Series was nearly perfect but I tweaked one thing...
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Matti Vaittinen (5):
>> dt-bindings: Add ROHM BD7970x variants
>> iio: dac: bd79703 Store device address to 'address'
>> dac: bd79703: Add chip data
>> iio: bd79703: Support BD79700 and BD79701
>> iio: dac: bd79703: Support ROHM BD79702
> Made the last 4 patch titles all start with
> iio: dac: bd79703:
> rather than this random mixture of prefixes.
Oh! Thanks! "iio: dac:" is obviously the right prefix for all of them!
> Applied to the testing branch of iio.git which will get rebase
> on rc1 sometime in next few days.
Yours,
-- Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists