[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025040719-utter-hydrant-b241@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 06:08:46 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
andy@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: Use % 4096u instead of & 0xfff
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:27:53AM +0000, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
> The sequence number is constrained to a range of [0, 4095], which
> is a total of 4096 values. The bitmask operation using `0xfff` is
> used to perform this wrap-around. While this is functionally correct,
> it obscures the intended semantic of a 4096-based wrap.
>
> Using a modulo operation with `4096u` makes the wrap-around logic
> explicit and easier to understand. It clearly signals that the sequence
> number cycles though a range of 4096 values.
>
> The use of `4096u` also guarantees that the modulo operation is performed
> with unsigned arithmetic, preventing potential issues with signed types.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
> David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Changed the commit message to a more descriptive message which
> makes it clear why the patch does the change.
> - Changed the subject title to include `4096u` to show that an unsigned
> module is used.
> Changes in v1:
> - Added more patch recipients.
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 6 +++---
Any specific reason you did not include the staging mailing list like
scripts/get_maintainers.pl asks you to?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists