[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfC7GukR5ZidkZJA8LMZaVXyqeygdUBz9v3oDmw8k+OPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:12:11 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: orion/gpio: use new line value setter callbacks
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 2:03 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 09:09:18AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
> > an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
> > them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> What is you intended merge path for these? Have arm-soc take them as a
> whole?
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
That would be best, yes. I'm not sure how many of these platforms are
actively maintained.
Arnd: you were not Cc'ed on this (get_maintainer.pl didn't show your
address) but could you take this through the arm-soc tree?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists