linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: orion/gpio: use new line value setter callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <18d59ff1-a357-413c-bde2-961ae0c9b5f2@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:38:48 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
 "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>,
 "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: orion/gpio: use new line value setter callbacks

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 14:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 2:03 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 09:09:18AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
>> > an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
>> > them.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>
>> What is you intended merge path for these? Have arm-soc take them as a
>> whole?
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>>
>
> That would be best, yes. I'm not sure how many of these platforms are
> actively maintained.
>
> Arnd: you were not Cc'ed on this (get_maintainer.pl didn't show your
> address) but could you take this through the arm-soc tree?

Sure, can you send them once more to soc@...ts.linux.dev, either
as patches or a pull request?

      Arnd