[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0558b7f7-8c69-4664-afc6-bae4fdc6f071@web.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:23:35 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla
<sudeep.holla@....com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference
in get_rate()
> This series fixes potential NULL pointer dereferences in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()
> and scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() when cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() returns NULL.
>
> Henry Martin (2):
> cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()
> cpufreq: scpi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scpi_cpufreq_get_rate()
Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists