[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409-merry-gay-lemur-8288cf@sudeepholla>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:20:31 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference
in get_rate()
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:23:35PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > This series fixes potential NULL pointer dereferences in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()
> > and scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() when cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() returns NULL.
> >
> > Henry Martin (2):
> > cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()
> > cpufreq: scpi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scpi_cpufreq_get_rate()
>
> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
>
This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
community are doing already.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists