linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250409-manipulative-tall-alligator-5e6c4a@sudeepholla>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:30:04 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>
Cc: cristian.marussi@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference
 in get_rate()

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:03:52PM +0800, Henry Martin wrote:
> This series fixes potential NULL pointer dereferences in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()
> and scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() when cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() returns NULL.
> 

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

I think unlikely is needed even in this patch[1] and thats what Viresh
meant when he mention all similar changes under one series and consistent
change.

Also I just happened to notice similar patches posted while ago[2][3].
Not sure how to handle the situation though.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250405061927.75485-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230093159.258813-1-hanchunchao@inspur.com
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230090137.243825-1-hanchunchao@inspur.com