[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52aa52a5-7081-41ee-872e-f1728c06daf1@web.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:48:33 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference
in get_rate()
>> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
>
> This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
> community are doing already.
Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists