linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z_Zhp38o9KiicPVw@pluto>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:01:43 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference
 in get_rate()

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 01:48:33PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?

I agree with Sudeep, the above sentence is completely incomprehensible
to me

> >
> > This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
> > community are doing already.
> Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways?
>

...this is more comprehensible, but again I cannot grasp what's yor advice
specifically on this commit message.

Thanks,
Cristian