linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] RAS/AMD/{ATL,FMPM}: Get masked address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250408201055.GA2700280@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:10:55 -0400
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
	Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@....com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RAS/AMD/{ATL,FMPM}: Get masked address

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 07:33:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:52:42AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > At the moment, FMPM only loads on MI300A. We can just have a local
> > function to mask the addresses. I was thinking we can have function
> > pointers to make things generic. But maybe we keep it simple until
> > really necessary by just using the MI300 version by default.
> 
> Now you're talking! :-P
> 
> > Please see patch below.
> 
> ... which I simplified even more.
> 
> I'm thinking whoever is going to test fmpm on something else besides MI300A,
> they will have to extend this address masking thing and then we can cross that
> bridge when we get to it.
> 
> So this is keeping it simple for now.
> 
> Ack?

Yes, looks good to me.

Thanks!

-Yazen