[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250410095135.GBZ_eUp4QTXrx-slj1@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:51:35 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@....com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RAS/AMD/{ATL,FMPM}: Get masked address
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:10:55PM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 07:33:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:52:42AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > > At the moment, FMPM only loads on MI300A. We can just have a local
> > > function to mask the addresses. I was thinking we can have function
> > > pointers to make things generic. But maybe we keep it simple until
> > > really necessary by just using the MI300 version by default.
> >
> > Now you're talking! :-P
> >
> > > Please see patch below.
> >
> > ... which I simplified even more.
> >
> > I'm thinking whoever is going to test fmpm on something else besides MI300A,
> > they will have to extend this address masking thing and then we can cross that
> > bridge when we get to it.
> >
> > So this is keeping it simple for now.
> >
> > Ack?
>
> Yes, looks good to me.
Queued, thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists