[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86semjku7x.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 08:06:42 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com,
bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
decui@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
hpa@...or.com,
joey.gouly@....com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
kw@...ux.com,
kys@...rosoft.com,
lenb@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com,
mingo@...hat.com,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
rafael@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com,
sudeep.holla@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de,
wei.liu@...nel.org,
will@...nel.org,
yuzenghui@...wei.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org,
apais@...rosoft.com,
benhill@...rosoft.com,
bperkins@...rosoft.com,
sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v7 01/11] arm64: kvm, smccc: Introduce and use API for getting hypervisor UUID
On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:13:26 +0100,
Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> The KVM/arm64 uses SMCCC to detect hypervisor presence. That code is
> private, and it follows the SMCCC specification. Other existing and
> emerging hypervisor guest implementations can and should use that
> standard approach as well.
>
> Factor out a common infrastructure that the guests can use, update KVM
> to employ the new API. The central notion of the SMCCC method is the
> UUID of the hypervisor, and the new API follows that.
>
> No functional changes. Validated with a KVM/arm64 guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 10 +++--
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c | 10 +----
> drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 17 ++++++++
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index 67f6fdf2e7cd..4bb38f0e3fe2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
>
> #include <linux/args.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> +#endif
That's a pretty unusual guard in arm64 land. Looking at the current
state of the kernel:
$ git grep -w __ASSEMBLER__ arch/arm64/ | wc -l
2
$ git grep -w __ASSEMBLY__ arch/arm64/ | wc -l
122
I'd suggest the later rather than the former.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists