[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_TMNOHY4iEDMOB8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 09:11:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
> I decided to keep the "unsupported instruction in callable function"
> warning, it's not hurting anything. As a result we now have
> INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET.
>
> v4:
> - split up patches
> - don't get rid of "unsupported instruction in callable function" warning
> - split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH -> INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/9b23e4413873bee38961e628b0c73f6d3a26d494.1743799705.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
>
> Josh Poimboeuf (4):
> objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret()
> objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET
> objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2
> objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics
>
> arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S | 4 +---
> tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 18 ++++++++++-------
> tools/objtool/check.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> tools/objtool/include/objtool/arch.h | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
I'm wondering about the timing: can this wait for v6.16, or does it
trigger on some popular config/build-tools combination?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists