[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMyr_bKgveKkpRdOWw+VfZDWridLirHp4VoeG_F-wwgSY5jpgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:38:28 +0100
From: Richard Akintola <princerichard17a@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Samuel Abraham <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] staging: sm750fb: change function naming style
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:01 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 06:57:38AM +0100, Richard Akintola wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 3:16 PM Samuel Abraham
> > <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
> > > did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
> > > Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
> > > kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
> > > needs to be done here to properly describe this.
> >
> >
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> > I sent the patches individually before, but I was instructed to send a
> > patch series.
> >
> > Given that I didn't change any code, should I still add version number
> > and sending
> > patch series as the difference?
>
> Yes.
>
> Think about it from our side, what would you want to see if you had to
> review hundreds of different patches a day?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
I have sent the new version, please do have a look at it.
Thank you.
Richard Akintola
Powered by blists - more mailing lists