[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daf7934a-17f7-4e41-ba00-cec155437c7e@web.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:24:01 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in
get_rate()
>> May the usage of abbreviations be reconsidered once more also for such messages
>> (in presented update steps)?
>
> Still can't understand you. Sorry for that. …
Will any communication challenges need further clarifications also according to
wordings like the following?
* null-ptr-deref
* null pointer dereference
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists