[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409-glistening-hasty-ape-c9c7e9@sudeepholla>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:21:30 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in
get_rate()
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>>> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly?
> >
> > I agree with Sudeep, the above sentence is completely incomprehensible
> > to me
>
> Can any suggestions gain acceptance also for better summary phrases?
>
>
>
> >>> This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the
> >>> community are doing already.
> >> Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways?
> >
> > ...this is more comprehensible,
>
> Thanks for another bit of constructive information.
>
>
> > but again I cannot grasp what's yor advice
> > specifically on this commit message.
> May the usage of abbreviations be reconsidered once more also for such messages
> (in presented update steps)?
>
Still can't understand you. Sorry for that. Alternatively, you can do what
I sometimes do: just write the whole commit log as you would expect and see
if that helps. I am sure that helps, so please do that.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists