linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs-amp-lib-test: Don't select SND_SOC_CS_AMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e94dd2e-e242-4bff-be85-d3029fb08693@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 15:37:45 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs-amp-lib-test: Don't select SND_SOC_CS_AMP_LIB

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 09/04/2025 3:24 pm, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This by itself results in the Cirrus tests being removed from a kunit
> > --alltests run which is a regression in coverage.  I'd expect to see
> > some corresponding updates in the KUnit all_tests.config to keep them
> > enabled.

> That's the defined behaviour of KUNIT_ALL_TESTS. It shouldn't have been
> running as part of an alltests if nothing had selected it. That seems to
> make people angry. Probably the same people who would complain if there
> was a bug in the code that they didn't want to test.

Hence the updates to all_tests.config...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)