[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409143751.2010391-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:37:51 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Prevent abuse of lockdep subclass
As I have seen code trying to use a subclass value >=
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES (8), add a DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() statement to
notify the users that such a large value is not allowed.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 58d78a33ac65..3fb79d8fecdf 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -5101,6 +5101,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
lockevent_inc(lockdep_nocheck);
}
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(subclass >= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES))
+ return 0;
+
if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES)
class = lock->class_cache[subclass];
/*
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists