[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43dd7191-c797-4d8c-af58-03fc0eaaa95b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:58:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document IPQ5424
compatible
On 08/04/2025 10:49, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> Add compatible for Qualcomm's IPQ5424 IMEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Why is this RFC? What is not finished here? I could not find explanation
in cover letter.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists