[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025041049-pushing-paced-3a3e@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:50:06 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, jpanis@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: tps6594-pfsm: Add NULL check in tps6594_pfsm_probe
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 06:52:53PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this
> returned value in tps6594_pfsm_probe() is not checked.
> Add NULL check in tps6594_pfsm_probe(), to handle kernel NULL
> pointer dereference error.
>
> Fixes: a0df3ef087f8 ("misc: tps6594-pfsm: Add driver for TI TPS6594 PFSM")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/tps6594-pfsm.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/tps6594-pfsm.c b/drivers/misc/tps6594-pfsm.c
> index 0a24ce44cc37..05c4e081a8d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/tps6594-pfsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/tps6594-pfsm.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,11 @@ static int tps6594_pfsm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pfsm->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
> pfsm->miscdev.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "pfsm-%ld-0x%02x",
> tps->chip_id, tps->reg);
> + if (!pfsm->miscdev.name) {
> + devm_kfree(dev, pfsm);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
How was this found and tested?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists