lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174429282080.80887.6648935549042489213.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:47:00 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, 
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, 
 Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: fsl_qmc_audio: Reset audio data pointers on
 TRIGGER_START event

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:16:43 +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> On SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START event, audio data pointers are not reset.
> 
> This leads to wrong data buffer usage when multiple TRIGGER_START are
> received and ends to incorrect buffer usage between the user-space and
> the driver. Indeed, the driver can read data that are not already set by
> the user-space or the user-space and the driver are writing and reading
> the same area.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl: fsl_qmc_audio: Reset audio data pointers on TRIGGER_START event
      commit: 9aa33d5b4a53a1945dd2aee45c09282248d3c98b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ