[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250409172954.7e17e083ac8f061ea829663c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 17:29:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Track node vacancy to reduce worst case
allocation counts
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:51:29 -0400 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 4/7/25 2:40 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > v3[3] -> v4:
> > - fix bug reported by Vasily Gorbik by fixing condition for
> > mast_overflow() and add test case for this condition. This fix
> > was also tested on s390 by Vasily.
> >
> > - cleanup new_height variable usage in mas_spanning_rebalance()
> > and add an additional test to make sure mt_height() is correct
> > after a rebalance causes a tree's height to decrease per Liam.
> >
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Could the following fixup patch be applied to the end of this series? If
> you'd prefer a new version of the series I can do that as well.
Liam mentioned a couple of "nits" so I think a V5 would be appropriate,
thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists