[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2806f87-05e1-4bf4-b9b9-21f35c419cf0@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:47:25 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Chandra Merla <cmerla@...hat.com>,
Stable@...r.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for
non-existing queues
Am 11.04.25 um 14:42 schrieb Heiko Carstens:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:11:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 10.04.25 um 20:44 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>> [...]
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> So, given that
>>>
>>> (a) people are actively running into this
>>> (b) we'll have to backport this quite a lot
>>> (c) the spec issue is not a s390x-only issue
>>> (d) it's still unclear how to best deal with the spec issue
>>>
>>> I suggest getting this fix here upstream asap. It will neither making sorting out the spec issue easier nor harder :)
>>>
>>> I can spot it in the s390 fixes tree already.
>>
>> Makes sense to me. MST, ok with you to send via s390 tree?
>
> Well, it is already part of a pull request:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411100301.123863C11-hca@linux.ibm.com/
Oh, I missed that.
>
> ...and contains all the Acks that were given in this thread.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists