[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3977aa0c-144f-4a1d-9ca1-927f23d39cef@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:34:40 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Chandra Merla <cmerla@...hat.com>, Stable@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for
non-existing queues
On 11.04.25 14:42, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:11:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 10.04.25 um 20:44 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>> [...]
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> So, given that
>>>
>>> (a) people are actively running into this
>>> (b) we'll have to backport this quite a lot
>>> (c) the spec issue is not a s390x-only issue
>>> (d) it's still unclear how to best deal with the spec issue
>>>
>>> I suggest getting this fix here upstream asap. It will neither making sorting out the spec issue easier nor harder :)
>>>
>>> I can spot it in the s390 fixes tree already.
>>
>> Makes sense to me. MST, ok with you to send via s390 tree?
>
> Well, it is already part of a pull request:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411100301.123863C11-hca@linux.ibm.com/
Awesome, thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists