[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0c1c42-30a7-41f0-96a6-a0ec16808f88@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:49:22 -0500
From: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov"
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Dionna
Amalie Glaze" <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, Guorui Yu
<guorui.yu@...ux.alibaba.com>, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Dan Middleton
<dan.middleton@...ux.intel.com>, Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/tdx: Add tdx_mcall_extend_rtmr() interface
On 4/9/2025 12:10 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Cedric Xing wrote:
>> The TDX guest exposes one MRTD (Build-time Measurement Register) and four
>> RTMR (Run-time Measurement Register) registers to record the build and boot
>> measurements of a virtual machine (VM). These registers are similar to PCR
>> (Platform Configuration Register) registers in the TPM (Trusted Platform
>> Module) space. This measurement data is used to implement security features
>> like attestation and trusted boot.
>>
>> To facilitate updating the RTMR registers, the TDX module provides support
>> for the `TDG.MR.RTMR.EXTEND` TDCALL which can be used to securely extend
>> the RTMR registers.
>>
>> Add helper function to update RTMR registers. It will be used by the TDX
>> guest driver in enabling RTMR extension support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Typically Signed-off-by without Co-developed-by means that the patch was
> submitted upstream be Sathya, so did you also intend to add a
> Co-developed-by or should this solo tag just be Reviewed-by?
>
I did modify slightly this commit from Sathya. I could be wrong but was
told that "Signed-off-by:" was necessary to certify I had the authority
to submit this patch. scripts/checkpatch.py complained about the
co-existence of "Co-developed-by" and "Signed-off-by". So I had to keep
the "Signed-off-by" tag only.
>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
>> index edab6d6049be..b042ca74bcd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> /* TDX Module call error codes */
>> #define TDCALL_RETURN_CODE(a) ((a) >> 32)
>> #define TDCALL_INVALID_OPERAND 0xc0000100
>> +#define TDCALL_OPERAND_BUSY 0x80000200
>>
>> #define TDREPORT_SUBTYPE_0 0
>>
>> @@ -136,6 +137,41 @@ int tdx_mcall_get_report0(u8 *reportdata, u8 *tdreport)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_mcall_get_report0);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * tdx_mcall_extend_rtmr() - Wrapper to extend RTMR registers using
>> + * TDG.MR.RTMR.EXTEND TDCALL.
>> + * @index: Index of RTMR register to be extended.
>> + * @data: Address of the input buffer with RTMR register extend data.
>> + *
>> + * Refer to section titled "TDG.MR.RTMR.EXTEND leaf" in the TDX Module
>> + * v1.0 specification for more information on TDG.MR.RTMR.EXTEND TDCALL.
>> + * It is used in the TDX guest driver module to allow user extend the
>> + * RTMR registers (index > 1).
>> + *
>> + * Return 0 on success, -EINVAL for invalid operands, -EBUSY for busy
>> + * operation or -EIO on other TDCALL failures.
>> + */
>> +int tdx_mcall_extend_rtmr(u8 index, u8 *data)
>> +{
>> + struct tdx_module_args args = {
>> + .rcx = virt_to_phys(data),
>> + .rdx = index,
>> + };
>> + u64 ret;
>> +
>> + ret = __tdcall(TDG_MR_RTMR_EXTEND, &args);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (TDCALL_RETURN_CODE(ret) == TDCALL_INVALID_OPERAND)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Here is where the ABI documentation can help to make sure that userspace
> can tell the difference between userspace bugs, kernel bugs, or TDX
> internal errors. So perhaps translate this EINVAL to
> ENXIO in tsm-mr.c. Otherwise, this patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
Agreed. I'll change -EINVAL to -ENXIO as this would be due to the
inability to convert VA to GPA.
> [..]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists