[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41e7d947-d59f-41a9-a540-d3c07e4678c4@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:22:23 -0500
From: Junxuan Liao <ljx@...wisc.edu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tracing: introduce enter/exit tracepoint pairs for
page faults
On 4/14/25 6:14 PM, Junxuan Liao wrote:
> Do people find separate user/kernel tracepoints useful? For me, I can
> check regs in eBPF tracing code instead.
I think it might be good to add a field to the tracepoints to indicate
whether it's in user space or not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists