[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_zjki8ShybzpWDk@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:29:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] gpio: regmap: Allow to allocate regmap-irq
device
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:46AM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> On Wed Apr 9, 2025 at 6:39 PM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:55:54PM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
...
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_REGMAP_IRQ
> >> + if (config->regmap_irq_chip) {
> >> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
> >> +
> >> + ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(config->parent, dev_fwnode(config->parent),
> >> + config->regmap, config->regmap_irq_irqno,
> >> + config->regmap_irq_flags, 0,
> >> + config->regmap_irq_chip, &irq_chip_data);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto err_free_gpio;
> >> +
> >> + irq_domain = regmap_irq_get_domain(irq_chip_data);
> >> + } else
> >> +#endif
> >> + irq_domain = config->irq_domain;
> >
> >> +
> >
> > This is blank line is not needed, but I not mind either way.
>
> I can remove it, but as the line above is potentially part of the
> "else", I have a small preference for keeping it.
Yes, but it's still coupled with the flow. But okay to leave as is.
> >> + if (irq_domain) {
> >> + ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain(chip, irq_domain);
> >> if (ret)
> >> goto err_remove_gpiochip;
> >> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists