linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] brcm80211: fmac: Add error handling forbrcmf_usb_dl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025041507-proclaim-frigidity-da8c@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:43:13 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: vulab@...as.ac.cn, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
	brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
	Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
	Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
	Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcm80211: fmac: Add error handling
 forbrcmf_usb_dl_writeimage()

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:21:23PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > brcmf_usb_dl_cmd() but dose not check its return value. The
> > 'state.state' and the 'state.bytes' are uninitialized if the
> …
> 
> Would you ever like to benefit any more from change descriptions
> which may contain text lines that would occasionally be longer
> than 60 characters?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot