[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaHru55wo5MdVsRKRbfPS9Hv3vGxgXNi8eXGvAOQzyDww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:34:25 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: amd: Fix use of undeclared identifier 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops'
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:35 PM Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>
> `pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops` is hidden under both `CONFIG_ACPI` and
> `CONFIG_PM_SLEEP` so the functions that use it need the same scope.
>
> Adjust checks to look for both, and while updating make it CONFIG_SUSPEND
> instead as that's what the acpi header uses.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504100420.88UPkUTU-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> v2:
> Use CONFIG_SUSPEND instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
This seems to be based on the previous fixes merged by Rafael?
Do I need to rebase on -rc2 or something to merge this patch?
Or can Rafael queue this too?
In that case:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists