linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/23] staging: gpib: u8 over uint8_t and u64 over uint64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025041519-drier-decimal-8a7f@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:45:58 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Rubin <matchstick@...erthere.org>
Cc: dpenkler@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/23] staging: gpib: u8 over uint8_t and u64 over
 uint64_t

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 06:09:30PM +0000, Michael Rubin wrote:
> Preferring u8 over uint8_t and preferring u64 over uint64_t to adhere to
> Linux code style.
> 
> * Patch 1 - Patch 22:
> 	Reported by checkpatch.pl.
> 	CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'
> 
> * Patch 23:
> 	Reported by checkpatch.pl.
> 	CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> 

Only a portion of this series could be applied, as I hit some patch
errors that I couldn't resolve easily.  Odds are we are out of sync
somehow, can you rebase and resend the remaining ones?

thanks,

greg k-h