linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/23] staging: gpib: u8 over uint8_t and u64 over uint64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aABPat7WxeVBIOQ5@tiamat>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:46:34 +0000
From: Michael Rubin <matchstick@...erthere.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: dpenkler@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/23] staging: gpib: u8 over uint8_t and u64 over
 uint64_t

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 04:45:58PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 06:09:30PM +0000, Michael Rubin wrote:
> > Preferring u8 over uint8_t and preferring u64 over uint64_t to adhere to
> > Linux code style.
> > 
> > * Patch 1 - Patch 22:
> > 	Reported by checkpatch.pl.
> > 	CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'
> > 
> > * Patch 23:
> > 	Reported by checkpatch.pl.
> > 	CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> > 
> 
> Only a portion of this series could be applied, as I hit some patch
> errors that I couldn't resolve easily.  Odds are we are out of sync
> somehow, can you rebase and resend the remaining ones?

Done. Hope these are the right ones.

Thanks for your patience.

Michael Rubin