[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_4q_1TEJgcvlUlr@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:46:39 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/node: Use
curr_node_memblock_intersect_memory_block to Get Memory Block NID if
CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is Set
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:06:55PM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
> On 4/11/25 4:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > It might make sense to use for_each_mem_range() as top level loop in
> > node_dev_init(), but that's a separate topic.
>
> Yes, this makes sense to me as well. So in your opinion, instead of adding
> a new memblock search function like I added , it's better to use
> |for_each_mem_range()| in|node_dev_init()|, which would work for all
> cases—regardless of whether|CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT| is set or
> not. Right?
Yes
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists