[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6b9a879-2d4c-4dc4-9977-e6eb93246f6d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:38:19 +0530
From: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/node: Use
curr_node_memblock_intersect_memory_block to Get Memory Block NID if
CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is Set
On 4/15/25 3:16 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:06:55PM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
>> On 4/11/25 4:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> It might make sense to use for_each_mem_range() as top level loop in
>>> node_dev_init(), but that's a separate topic.
>> Yes, this makes sense to me as well. So in your opinion, instead of adding
>> a new memblock search function like I added , it's better to use
>> |for_each_mem_range()| in|node_dev_init()|, which would work for all
>> cases—regardless of whether|CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT| is set or
>> not. Right?
>
> Yes
Thank you so much. I will implement it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists