linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] loop: aio inherit the ioprio of original request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z_8y55Y6qgqgEYHW@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:32:39 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Yunlong Xing <yunlong.xing@...soc.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	bvanassche@....org, niuzhiguo84@...il.com, yunlongxing23@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hao_hao.wang@...soc.com,
	zhiguo.niu@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] loop: aio inherit the ioprio of original request

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:47:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think we layer yours on top of this one, which is something I
> can just do without much trouble. Do we want the vfs_iter removal
> in 6.15 or is 6.16 fine for that?

Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling to my Easter vacation.

Given that Darrick somehow managed to hit this old bug due to other
setup changes 6.15 would be great, and it looks like that's what you
did even without an answer from me.  Thanks!