linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] loop: aio inherit the ioprio of original request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab04b913-5f66-4fb1-bf1f-8eaa42aaf71f@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:58:37 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Yunlong Xing <yunlong.xing@...soc.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
 bvanassche@....org, niuzhiguo84@...il.com, yunlongxing23@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hao_hao.wang@...soc.com, zhiguo.niu@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] loop: aio inherit the ioprio of original request

On 4/15/25 10:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:47:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I think we layer yours on top of this one, which is something I
>> can just do without much trouble. Do we want the vfs_iter removal
>> in 6.15 or is 6.16 fine for that?
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling to my Easter vacation.
> 
> Given that Darrick somehow managed to hit this old bug due to other
> setup changes 6.15 would be great, and it looks like that's what you
> did even without an answer from me.  Thanks!

Exactly, that's what pushed it over the edge for me. So all queued
up.

-- 
Jens Axboe