linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z_9Ta5CpplHUTK_X@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:51:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
	Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:01:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> OF and ACPI currently are using asymmetrical APIs to check
> for the firmware node type. Unify them by using is_*_node()
> against struct fwnode_handle pointer.

Note, media CI complains on wrong {} style, but
1) it was in the original code;
2) it is gone after the whole series applied.

I suggest to ignore that report based on the above.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko