[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_9TvqfEK-HsQpmM@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:52:46 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:51:24AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:01:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > OF and ACPI currently are using asymmetrical APIs to check
> > for the firmware node type. Unify them by using is_*_node()
> > against struct fwnode_handle pointer.
>
> Note, media CI complains on wrong {} style, but
> 1) it was in the original code;
Ah, actually not, it was not in the original code, so I can improve that,
of course, in v5.
> 2) it is gone after the whole series applied.
>
> I suggest to ignore that report based on the above.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists