[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_9kvTUIqOo7htBl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:05:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/fpu: Refactor xfeature bitmask update code for
sigframe XSAVE
* Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
> +static inline int set_xfeature_in_sigframe(struct xregs_state __user *xbuf, u64 mask)
> +{
> + u64 xfeatures;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Read the xfeatures value already saved in the user buffer */
> + err = __get_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
> + xfeatures |= mask;
> + err |= __put_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
> + return err;
> +}
For future reference, please put an extra newline before 'return'
statements, so that the code looks more 'balanced':
> +{
> + u64 xfeatures;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Read the xfeatures value already saved in the user buffer */
> + err = __get_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
> + xfeatures |= mask;
> + err |= __put_user(xfeatures, &xbuf->header.xfeatures);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
I've done that for this patch, so no need to resend it.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists